It's time, I told myself. You really should read some of these reports in detail, not just the headlines. You should look at more of the pictures, read the eyewitness accounts. So this morning I did. Or at least I tried, until I got so depressed I couldn't continue. That took maybe half an hour, maybe even less.
Over the last month, J. and I have been watching David Attenborough's amazing multi-episode nature programs for the BBC, "Planet Earth" and its predecessor, "Blue Planet," which is about the oceans. In both, Attenborough and his team made a conscious decision to focus on the beauty and wonder of the natural world rather than harping on the problems. Global warming, threats to biodiversity, endangerment, environmental pressure, habitat diminishment and species adaptation are all mentioned, but in the context of, for example, a near-starving polar bear having to range much much farther in her quest for food and becoming exhausted swimming in open water - something she never used to have to do. Still, the focus is on the creatures and plants themselves and the worlds they inhabit, which include many places few people visit and most of us will never have the opportunity to see. In general, I think it was an effective strategy: the despair and numbness I felt after only a few minutes of looking at environmental disaster is almost paralyzing, but look we must. What I'm thinking about this morning is the contrast.
"The Blue Planet" taught me, a woman who's lived most of her life far from the ocean, so much about the seas. I watched in utter amazement as the videos revealed so much more than I'd ever known about the migrations of herring; the electric creatures of the blacks depths; the intelligence and play of dolphins; the songs and journeys of the great whales; the vast forests of giant kelp and astounding color of coral reefs; the teeming colonies of tube worms living on deep-ocean volcanic vents untouched by the light we always thought was necessary for life; the unbelievable camouflage that's evolved to protect fish, crustaceans, invertebrates and given rise to creatures stranger than science fiction; the bloom of plankton so extensive that it colors the oceans when seen from space; and above all the endless struggle to eat and to reproduce in a ruthless watery world of hunters and the hunted.
Last night I began reading "Champlain's Dream," a biography by David Hackett of the French explorer who mapped and greatly influenced most of the places I've lived in my life. The frontispiece of the book is a map of "New France" drawn by Champlain himself in 1612, and I noticed his labels and drawings off the coast, including figures of whales and cod along the Grand Banks. It reminded me of the teeming abundance of the untouched oceans, the wonder of the first explorers, and the almost immediate exploitation of that abundance by human beings convinced both that the resources were theirs for the taking and that whatever it was - fish, forests, seals -- couldn't possibly run out. Without any oil disaster at all, how much has changed off our own coast since Champlain's time! How dare we have the audacity and hubris to disturb the complexity and balance of such an ecosystem? What's happening in the Gulf is an underwater Hiroshima, and as much as I deplore the economic cost to those whose livelihood depends on industries like fishing and tourism, I can't help but weep more for the creatures who live there, and who I've recently come to know and love even more.
The emotions we feel when we see a whale breach and dive, or a flock of seabirds lift into the sky, are not merely wonder but awe. And awe, I think, is an emotion that is meant to include recognition of our own smallness. How far we've come from both Old Testament fear and aboriginal wisdom! Our scientific and technological prowess allows us to think there's always a solution, a mechanical finger for the leaking dike, but what I see this morning are waves crashing over our own heads, full of wrath.
There are old photographs showing the size of the cod that used to be caught in the Gulf of St Lawrence. They were huge. I don't think any of those big old cod are still living and the ones that are living now will not reach that age. I limit myself to comments on what is nearby for similar reasons. I listen to BBC & NPR if only to keep from feeling guilty but this feeling of not being able to do anything is really toxic. Do you think God feels that way, too? (and yes I know God is ineffable and doesn't have, um, emotions exactly as we would know them... but I also believe we were made in the image of the infinite and if we have these runaway feelings, well, we got them someplace....).
Posted by: Vivian | June 10, 2010 at 11:27 AM
ps as a classicist you do well to choose & use an ampersand that actually reads "et" comme il faut.
Posted by: Vivian | June 10, 2010 at 11:28 AM
the blue whale is my favorite animal and that video has some of the more interesting facts! i used to go into the classrooms with materials and teach my boys' classes about these whales (from an arm chair scientist's perspective, of course). they are so amazed that it opens so many doors. bigger than the dinosaurs? really? and still alive?
and i've always loved the mystery of them: where they can just disappear to. thanks for posting the video!!!
Posted by: carolee | June 10, 2010 at 12:51 PM
(o)
Posted by: dale | June 10, 2010 at 01:05 PM
Beth, this short radio monologue, written and performed by the Scots writer A L Kennedy, whom you had occasion to mention recently, in response to the oil spill, is extraordinarily moving and to the point, I thought. Only available to listen until the end of tomorrow Saturday: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007lld4
Posted by: Jean | June 11, 2010 at 09:44 AM
(O)
Posted by: Lucy | June 11, 2010 at 10:45 AM
I meant also to say, re the A L Kennedy thing, that I think sometimes a creative resopnse to an awful situation is more bearable and useful than an intellectual one.
Posted by: Jean | June 11, 2010 at 12:54 PM
There are so many beautiful aspects of earth and life. Can we convince people to consume less, protect more . . . or is this human/cultural nature to think of one's own creature comforts first and then look outward, expecting to delight in natural wonders? A timely topic, Beth.
Posted by: Jan | June 13, 2010 at 11:28 AM
"How dare we have the audacity and hubris to disturb the complexity and balance of such an ecosystem?" Why wouldn't we use the oceans to the very edge of their/our survival when that's how we treat forests, mountains, meadows and all creatures that dwell there?
"What's happening in the Gulf is an underwater Hiroshima." See here for another perspective on the oil spill: The Feel-Good Spill of the Decade http://www.rifters.com/crawl/?p=1372
Posted by: ej | June 15, 2010 at 11:47 AM