Inspired by Liz Steel's color notes and example, I recently revamped my own watercolor palette. Some of the tubes in my watercolor box were at least thirty years old: a lot has changed in the industry since then and I needed to get up to speed. For a couple of weeks I've been testing seeing how some new pigments behave and interact with each other, and how they're different from my standard ones. By and large, I'm super happy with the changes, and really impressed by the brilliance, clarity and superb mixing qualities of these newer pigments. It's been fun and exciting to learn more and explore the modern world of color (who knew that modern pigments have coded numbers that standardize them across manufacturers? Not I!) I was a kid who could happily spend an entire afternoon rearranging her big box of Crayola crayons, so make of all this what you will...
So, be forewarned, COLOR-GEEK tech talk coming up -- I'm really grateful to Liz, and if the following is helpful to anyone, that's great. Please bear in mind that the color reproduction on-screen is close but only approximate.
The new colors I'm using are Quinacridrone Gold, Quin Burnt Orange, Quin Red, Nickel Azo Yellow, Pyrrol Orange, Indigo, Indanthrone Blue, and Sap Green. Yellow Ochre and Burnt Sienna will be phased out. My two standard yellows will be Nickel Azo and Winsor Yellow, with Cadmium Yellow still on the big palette but only used when I need its more opaque qualities; ditto for Cadmium Red. Cadmium and Cobalt are both toxic; and one of my goals was to move away from some of the more toxic colors. However, the Cobalts (blue, green, violet) will stay for me, since nothing has yet been invented to replace their gorgeous hues.
For blues, I'm keeping Cerulean, indispensible for skies; my beloved Cobalt, and French Ultramarine, along with Indigo, which will help me create very dark darks. I'm not sure about the Indanthrone yet, that's the next pigment to test more extensively. I'm absolutely thrilled with Quin Gold and Quin Burnt Orange, alone and when mixed with blues and greens to create dark colors.
(Foliage painted with sap green, nickel azo yellow, indigo. Sky is cerulean blue.)
Most of the time, I like to mix my greens, though I do keep Hooker's Green Deep and Permanent Green on my palette, and Cobalt Green for occasional use. Sap Green is a unique color, very difficult if not impossible to mix, and because I paint so many landscapes and foliage, it seemed like it would be useful - and I think I'm going to love it. The photos don't show its exact hue, in spite of an hour of fiddling with Photoshop.
I only bought one of the many shades of Quinacridone Red - Rose - Coral that are available. I wanted something stronger and more brilliant than Alizarin Crimson but still in the cool red range, and so far Quin Red is fitting the bill beautifully. Pyrrol Orange is a new pigment, very brilliant, and more transparent than Cadmium Orange; I like it but it's almost too bright for me. We'll see.
Except for Winsor Yellow, which is a proprietary Winsor&Newton color that I just happen to really like, all the new paints were purchased by mail order from Daniel Smith.
I found this post technically fascinating, but at the same time I despair. A number of your colours are dismissed by many 'experts', yet you use them to good effect. Why do I despair? Because one of the reasons I am put off watercolour painting is my inability to choose which colours and pigments to use, and how they will mix. Because I have very little time to choose to devote to painting, I do not wish to 'waste' time in trial and error. Thank you.
Posted by: Tom | August 25, 2013 at 06:50 AM
oh i wish i had some painting skills!
Posted by: flask | August 25, 2013 at 07:10 AM
Beth, I absolutely love those pages of colour tests - artworks in themselves, enhanced by the texture of the paper. Personally I don't like to have too many colours on my palette, whatever the medium, because so many tones can be mixed from just a few good basics but I do see the attraction of all those gorgeous hues available. Considering how expensive watercolour, gouache and acrylics are (not to mention oils) it drive me nuts when old tubes go hard as rock, even when the caps were screwed on tight!
It will be great to see your experiments with the new paints.
Posted by: Natalie | August 25, 2013 at 10:19 AM
Tom, please, no despairing! One can find all sorts of conflicting advice about watercolor palettes, but the fact remains (as Natalie says below) that excellent results can be obtained from a very limited palette, so long as the painter is willing to understand how those pigments mix together. With just three primaries you can do a great deal, and build on that. If you ever want to discuss this further, send me an email and I'd be glad to talk it over with you. There's no doubt that watercolor, however, is one of the most challenging and frustrating mediums that exist, particularly because there's no way to rescue a painting gone awry. However, with good paper, practice, and knowledge of one's pigments, it is possible both to plan ahead, and to "fix" a number of problems that do arise, short of a muddy disaster!
Flask: painting skills are less talent, I think, than practice. I hope you'll try, or take a course, if you'd really like to have a go at it.
Natalie - thanks for this - yes, I agree, as I wrote to Tom above. In the studio I have a big watercolor palette that holds a lot of colors but I rarely use more than 10, of which several may be only accents. I try to base each painting on a set of primaries, which may be cooler or warmer in tone, depending on the subject; for my basic palette I've tried to hone in on pairs of cool and warm reds, blues, and yellows, with the addition of two or three earth colors and the occasional extra, such as cobalt violet or green, which is hard to mix. For landscape, it's been helpful to me to paint sample sheets using different pairs of blues and yellows, and then "graying" those mixtures with different reds - I've learned a lot from this, and from repeating the exercise with pairs of reds and yellows. So a limited selection is all I seem to need, ditto for oil. I hear you about old paint: I cut open my hard tubes of watercolor and soften them in water - paints are so expensive - I even used up all of my mother's and great-aunt's old paints. It's really painful to have to throw away old oils, but I just did that with a bunch of useless paint. Ouch!
Posted by: Beth | August 25, 2013 at 01:51 PM
How curious those names are. As if they'd been created by a chemist who was doing his best to bestride the Twin Cultures but who couldn't quite make it.
My graphic skills most closely approximate those of Desperate Dan. Thus I am forced into a parallel world of comment. Faced with a sentence that needs completing I fossick among my collection of word-tubes noting some have become hard because of age and lack of use, others are seductively squelchy. (Fossick itself initially seemed hard but proved to have soft spots).
Automatically I distrust the squelchy tubes - their appeal is too obvious. They are like first ideas which so often turn out to be clichés in evening dress. But triage presents many problems. I once used sesquipedalian (the tube was rock hard) in a comment and it drew delighted responses. Words at least are finite, colours - as the colour wheel shows - are infinite. Hence the secret awe I try so hard to disguise when I approach The Cassandra Pages.
Posted by: Roderick Robinson | August 26, 2013 at 03:08 AM
Yes,fossicking for fossilized colors... (I would have had to look up "fossick" if its meaning wasn't obvious from context, though I did anyway and found it means primarily not merely searching, but to search for gold!) And "sesquipedalian"-- my God in heaven! I'm not sure words actually are finite in your hands, Roderick!
Posted by: Beth | August 26, 2013 at 09:05 AM
I love your color tests. And the new watercolor paintings with brilliant colors.
Posted by: Sharyn | August 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM
You are so lucky with your talents. I see similar talents developing in my granddaughters and am thrilled for them. They are going to an art camp this week. The ten year old did a good portrait of me which I'm going to frame. She has what it takes: good skills, imagination and persistence.
Posted by: Hattie | August 26, 2013 at 12:01 PM
Thank you, Sharyn!
Hattie - that's great! I'd love to see that portrait...
Posted by: Beth | August 26, 2013 at 12:42 PM
Colour-geek talk for sure, but the results are so cheerful. So much character. Always preferred watercolours over oil.
Posted by: Anil | August 26, 2013 at 01:17 PM
Hi Anil, it's great to hear from you! I like both mediums but
have always had a soft spot for the transparency and brilliance of watercolor. It feels really good to be experimenting and growing with it again.
Posted by: Beth | August 27, 2013 at 02:44 PM
dusdhdbttboesbqbhft, nzyabavmaq , [url=http://www.owwikhwqqz.com/]eutizptsqr[/url], http://www.wntkqqqmyv.com/ nzyabavmaq
Posted by: inysppuvri | August 29, 2013 at 02:16 PM
dusdhdbttboesbqbhft, nzyabavmaq , [url=http://www.owwikhwqqz.com/]eutizptsqr[/url], http://www.wntkqqqmyv.com/ nzyabavmaq
Posted by: inysppuvri | August 29, 2013 at 02:16 PM