Rough surf at Block Island. Fountain pen, grey ink, 8.5" x 5.5" on beige toned paper. First stage.
I was curious whether it would be possible to render such a complicated scene in pen and ink, without washes or color. It's difficult! This was the first state of the drawing. Later I added some white and brown colored pencil to increase the tonal range, and take advantage of the toned paper used for the drawing; I think I like it better as a drawing without, but the white makes it easier to "read" the scene. I'm not sure if the Block Island scene will end up as a painting or print or series of drawings, but I'm glad I did this study.
Rough surf at Block Island. Fountain pen, grey ink, colored pencil. 8.5" x 5.5" on beige toned paper. Second stage.
The real challenge -- and absorbing pleasure -- is to start with a blank page and, an hour or two later, see a depiction of the scene. That's the magic of drawing; it's what attracted me as a child and why I've kept drawing all my life. You're creating something from nothing, only through the work of your eye and your hand. Drawing can be so many things, done in so many styles. Sometimes I like to make a careful detailed study in order to help myself see what's actually there, where the structure and form lie, and so I can later make decisions about what to emphasize or leave out. But there is also genuine pleasure in the act of drawing itself - watching the tool move across the paper, seeing the marks emerge under your hand, feeling the tooth of the paper or its smoothness, watching shapes and forms develop, the unconscious process of making decisions as you work. It makes me angry when I think how many teachers and critics have disparaged students' abilities and their innate love of drawing, often discouraging them forever, and both forced students into particular styles or taken talented students apart for drawing in their own way. (My friend, the illustrator Priya Sebastien has recently written about this in her own life.) Drawing should be about joy and discovery, concentration and pleasure. It should be personal. It's so elemental, too, so fundamentally human - as the earliest cave paintings show us. How can anyone be so arrogant as to say, "this is the right way to draw, this is wrong?" And what harm they do!
Jose Maria Velasco, View of Chiquihuite Hill, watercolor on paper.
I've been inspired recently by looking closely at the work of Jose Maria Velasco (1840-1912) the legendary 19th. C. Mexican landscape painter. His drawings, watercolors and paintings are all marked by careful observation, immaculate draftsmanship, and patience -- while never losing sight of the whole, and as I stood in the gallery, moving closer and further away, what struck me the most was the extraordinary patience it must have taken for him to get it right: not just the details in the drawing, but the tonality, the exact precision of the colors he mixed. Each time I go to Mexico City I visit the National Gallery in order to see these paintings again: they remain fresh, alive, vibrant, and beautiful - even though they are very much in the academic tradition.
Jose Maria Velasco, Mexican landscape and detail, oil.
So many of us have lost that ability to be patient, either with our eyes or with our tools, perhaps because of the premium that has been placed on spontaneity and originality in modern art, and on speed and output in modern life in general. What we forget is that even the great innovators, like Picasso, were also great draftsmen, and they didn't acquire the skill to innovate, play, invent, and adapt without learning to see, and to draw extremely well. Patient, careful observation is the foundation of the most memorable art, from the great masters to Lucien Freud. You have to see first, and drawing is a way to see fully. To do that, you have to settle down for a while, a good long while, and put in the time. Then you can let it go into abstraction, allow your emotional response to dominate -- whatever is right for you at that time, with that subject. But if you don't know what an eye, or a fish, or a particular rock looks like to begin with, how are you ever going to capture its essence, let alone distort it at will?
Jose Maria Velasco, Rocks, oil study.
I say this because patience has always been a problem for me, in art, in practicing the piano, in slowing down enough to read carefully. I absolutely refused to play scales or etudes on the piano or flute, and my technique has always been weak as a result. In other areas, calligraphy for instance, I was willing to write pages and pages of examples. Some of the problem is just my impatient nature, my tendency to get bored, and an innate ability to "get by" on less-than-full attention. Some of it is the preference for expressive brushwork or an energetic line -- or sight-reading a new piece of music. Some of it is restlessness: the internal desire to move on to the next thing when the first one isn't finished. At the same time, I'm capable of being very attentive and patient when I remember to be, or when I insist on it for myself. I'm always glad when I give myself an exercise in slowing down, because I always learn something valuable and notice things I'd otherwise miss. Drawing is the back-to-basics practice that is the foundation for everything else. My friends who are professional orchestra players still practice every day; I need to draw every day too.
Vincent Van Gogh, A Fishing Boat at Sea, pen and ink, 1888.
The sketchbooks of great draftsmen are always inspiring - I think of Turner, Whistler, Van Gogh, Sargent, Winslow Homer. Because they were working more quickly than in the studio, their drawings often contain an energy, embodied in the line or the brushstroke, that is as palpable as the wind. Yet, they had the skill, honed by years of practice, to use every minute well, through patient concentration, and I don't think they saw their studies as "lesser" works. Sargent, who made his living from society portraits, once said that his true legacy would be his watercolors, and that is proving to be the case. Van Gogh's drawings of landscapes, trees, and gardens are every bit as moving to me as his paintings. And when I stand in a museum in front of one of these drawings or watercolor studies, I also feel myself, and my connection with all the other artists who have also faced a scene and the next blank page.
J.M. Turner, Storm at Sea, watercolor without pencil underdrawing.
Lovely post, Beth. I like your Block Island piece, and the introduction to Velasco.
In our time when the post-Warhol avant garde has been dead and a growing minority of painters are moving forward by going back through the tradition, I expect the reputation of "academic painters" will keep being on the rise. How to turn the wheel when it has been dismantled? Interesting answers are coming up.
Posted by: marly youmans | May 01, 2018 at 12:22 PM
Beth, I agree wholly with your remarks about drawing but I'm not so enthusiastic about Velasco's paintings, at least the ones above. No doubt at all that they're very skillful and charmingg but for me they lack backbone, je ne sais quoi. Yes he's patient and precise but too soft, too anxious to please. It's partly due to the preferred styles of that period but also I don't feel he was really immersed in what he was looking at. Intellectually yes, but not viscerally (unlike Van Gogh). Take the top watercolour for instance: he's poured caramel sauce over those rocks and sweetened them so you could eat them with a spoon. You couldn't climb them and they wouldn't cut you if you scraped against them. The other landscapes are very pretty but also coated in sauce. I don't mean just the colour but the whole aura. The bottom study of rocks is the best, in my view,but still too bland.
Oh la la, I've gone into lecture mode...Stop me before I start rapping knuckles!
Ilike your top drawing - plunge in! Not too much of the cross-hatching.
Posted by: Natalie | May 01, 2018 at 05:04 PM
In the uncolored version, I found my eye was drawn to the waves, and I really liked the -- no pun intended -- fluid feeling they gave. You must have studied waves a while to catch that. The white tint in the color version drew me back to the shore in the middle, and gave me more a sense of the scale. You don't mind if I envy you, even if I understand how much work is going on in the background?
Posted by: Peter | May 02, 2018 at 08:58 AM