The first two Native-American women. First two Muslim women. First Somali-American, a former refugee. Youngest woman ever, a Latina. First black female congresswoman from her state...They are the hope for me today: the brown female faces of those who won seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, along with many white women who also won races, and the first gay male state governor. These are the faces of the future — though their majority power may be very far away, beyond my lifetime even.
When I look at the map, the polarization is depressingly clear, and I can’t even feel smug about Quebec being better, after our last election. It was just the same: most of the rural, homogeneous French-Canadian areas went conservative, while the diverse metropolitan areas (chiefly Montreal) were solidly progressive. The real question in so many places today seems to be: do you want someone who will actually work for the things that benefit all people, or do you want someone who looks like you, expresses the same fears, and wants to go back to the past?
There were a lot of “firsts” yesterday. That’s very significant, though it made me simultaneously weep with happiness at seeing those faces, and rage that it’s taken so long and come with such a hard fight –- which will, of course, have to continue. And I'm not naive. These are modest gains, and even a Democratically-controlled House will, at best, create a stalemate with the executive branch and Senate, that will of course be blamed for blocking legislation and starting investigations. I'm appalled at the support this president still enjoys, and in some parts of the country, it seems more solid than ever, with a looming possibility of re-election in 2020.
--
Looking at the Senate and House electoral maps today caused me to reflect on the election of Gene Robinson, the first openly gay bishop in the Episcopal Church of the United States, ten years ago. The church’s polity is set up the same way as Congress, with a House of Bishops, one from each diocese, and a much larger body made up of lay delegates and clergy, equally represented by four of each from every diocese. In every single step toward inclusivity — allowing the ordination of the first black priest, the first woman, the first openly gay priest, and then bishops in each of those categories — the House of Deputies voted positively years before the House of Bishops did, and in exactly that order: blacks, women, gay. And of course, representation in the House of Deputies was itself reflective of that diversity long before there were black, female, and gay bishops. But it did happen. The people in the churches elected the delegates and changed those bodies; the lay delegates pushed the clergy to be more progressive, and eventually even the House of Bishops changed. It's inevitable, but it took a long, long time even in one of the most progressive religious denominations in the United States. Ten years later, however, a great deal has changed in attitudes toward homosexuality in the general population, friends and colleagues, and forced them to confront a choice between love or rejection of real people. We should see this as an indication that change is absolutely possible.
--
I've been on the side of immigrants and non-whites all my life, and especially so since marrying into an Arab/Armenian immigrant family, with multiple personal histories of genocide and narrow escapes from persecution to begin life again in new places. Twelve years of being a Canadian-American, and having opportunities to travel, especially in Latin America, have only made me MORE sympathetic and more identified with migrants and refugees. I’m grateful for my life experiences and fervently wish I could share them with a lot more people, because I think if you don’t live it, or have very close relationships with people who do, it’s hard to really get it. Thus, the map we keep seeing, and the fears that keep being exploited.
Besides this endemic hatred of "the other", the environment is the other issue that creates ongoing despair for me. There is so little time, and so little will on the parts of governments -- in fact I believe we've already passed a critical window where reversal was possible. So much of what I have valued and loved about the Earth is in danger of being lost forever. To me, this is the fundamental issue of our time, and even here in Quebec, where many people say they do care about the natural world and live close to it, the new government feels it is not important, and secondary to economic concerns. How shortsighted can we be?
Today is a day to rejoice in a first step back from the precipice Trump's presidency has placed us in. Frankly, though, we can't let up for a minute.
Beth, I'm feeling many of the same things you articulate here. I went for a walk today up the road behind my condo, where the road turns to dirt and passes cornfields and farms, and I thought about the balance of action and introspection, and the balance of having a clear-eyed view of how broken things are while also rejoicing at how far we've come. Temperamentally I need some optimism or I descend too easily into despair. I'm trying to focus on the positives today, including the ones you mentioned in your post. And... I see more clearly than ever before how long the road ahead will be.
Posted by: Rachel Barenblat | November 07, 2018 at 02:17 PM
I believe it is useful to ask persons (both for and against immigration), what a man asked me a year or so ago, as I tried on a coat in his store: "Where are your people from?" Unless a person is indigenous, our families all came here from somewhere else, and the majority have histories of struggle.
I've also been influenced by working with persons from all over the world, some immigrants, some here to study or on an assignment.
Posted by: Duchesse | November 08, 2018 at 05:17 PM
Having recently retired from almost 30 years of refugee work, it is hard to see the demise of the U.S. refugee program. When I started in this work, the U.S. accepted over 130k refugees. In FY18, only 22k were admitted; the lowest number of refugees the US has accepted in 40 years. Over the years, I had the privilege (and sadness) of hearing their often horrific stories of loss and displacement. I visited refugees in their homes where I was welcomed as an honored guest, when in fact the honor of visiting them was mine. The lack of compassion in the current administration is beyond understanding--led by the little-minded Miller and his even smaller-minded boss. Rage at this turn of events is overwhelming, but I will take a little consolation in seeing the young Somali-American woman, a former refugee, heading to Congress.
Posted by: Mary | November 10, 2018 at 04:41 AM